Blood Biomarkers from the Emergency Department Disclose Severe Omicron COVID-19-Associated Outcomes.

BACKGROUND: Since its outbreak, Coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19), a life-threatening respiratory illness, has rapidly become a public health emergency with a devastating social impact. Lately, the Omicron strain is considered the main variant of concern. Routine blood biomarkers are, indeed, essential for stratifying patients at risk of severe outcomes, and a huge amount of data is available in the literature, mainly for the previous variants. However, only a few studies are available on early routine biochemical blood biomarkers for Omicron-afflicted patients. Thus, the aim and novelty of this study were to identify routine blood biomarkers detected at the emergency room for the early prediction of severe morbidity and/or mortality. METHODS: 449 COVID-19 patients from Sapienza University Hospital of Rome were divided into four groups: (1) the emergency group (patients with mild forms who were quickly discharged); (2) the hospital ward group (patients that after the admission in the emergency department were hospitalized in a COVID-19 ward); (3) the intensive care unit (ICU) group (patients that after the admission in the emergency department required intensive assistance); (4) the deceased group (patients that after the admission in the emergency department had a fatal outcome). RESULTS: ANOVA and ROC data showed that high-sensitivity troponin-T (TnT), fibrinogen, glycemia, C-reactive protein, lactate dehydrogenase, albumin, D-dimer myoglobin, and ferritin for both men and women may predict lethal outcomes already at the level of the emergency department. CONCLUSIONS: Compared to previous Delta COVID-19 parallel emergency patterns of prediction, Omicron-induced changes in TnT may be considered other early predictors of severe outcomes.

Oral antivirals against Sars-CoV-2 in multiple myeloma outpatients: a case series.

Recently, the therapeutic armamentarium against Sars-CoV-2 has been enriched with oral antivirals that can be used in the early phases of covid-19. Real-life data on their efficacy in multiple myeloma (Mm) outpatients with mild-to-moderate covid-19 are lacking. We described the clinical outcomes at 30 days in Mm subjects with covid-19 treated with oral antivirals. Nirmatrelvir/r was prescribed in 10 subjects whereas molnupiravir in 5. Despite two hospitalizations were reported, we did not observe deaths due to covid-19 in this vulnerable group. Our preliminary observations reinforce the early use of oral antivirals as a useful means to contain severe covid-19 in high-risk patients such as Mm individuals characterized by an impaired immune response.

Efficacy and safety of oral antivirals in individuals aged 80 years or older with mild-to-moderate COVID-19: preliminary report from an Italian Prescriber Center.

Introduction: Molnupiravir and Nirmatrelvir/ritonavir( r), have demonstrated to prevent the progression to severe COVID-19 in high-risk individuals. Real life data are lacking in the elderly. Methods: All consecutive individuals aged ≥80 years with confirmed COVID-19 and mild-to-moderate illness who received an oral antiviral prescription between 11th January and 31st May 2022 were included in this retrospective single-centre study. The aim was to assess safety and effectiveness of oral antivirals in individuals ≥80 years with mild to moderate COVID-19. Results: A total of 168 subjects ≥80 years were included. Molnupiravir was prescribed in 147 (87.5%) subjects whereas Nirmatrelvir/r in 21 (12.5%); 16 (9.5%) experienced at least one adverse event. Overall, 21 (12.5%) hospitalizations and five deaths were reported at 28 days. At multivariate analysis male sex (OR=4.196, 95% CI=1.479-11.908; p=0.007), a moderate illness at time of prescription (OR=10.946, 95% CI=2.857-41.395; p=0.0005) and a greater number of days from the onset of symptoms to the therapy (OR=2.066, 95% CI=1.285-3.322; p=0.0027) were associated with hospitalization and/or death. Conclusion: In this real-life setting, including older individuals' hospitalizations and mortality at 28 days remained low thanks to the prompt initiation of oral antiviral therapy. The use of oral antivirals can play a significant role in reducing healthcare costs and ensuring benefits among the elderly population.

Early Access to Oral Antivirals in High-Risk Outpatients: Good Weapons to Fight COVID-19.

INTRODUCTION: Molnupiravir and Nirmatrelvir/r (NMV-r) have been proven to reduce severe Coronavirus Disease 2019 (COVID-19) in unvaccinated high-risk individuals. Data regarding their impact in fully vaccinated vulnerable subjects with mild-to-moderate COVID-19 are still limited, particularly in the era of Omicron and sub-variants. METHODS: Our retrospective study aimed to compare the safety profile and effectiveness of the two antivirals in all consecutive high-risk outpatients between 11 January and 10 July 2022. A logistic regression model was carried out to assess factors associated with the composite outcome defined as all-cause hospitalization and/or death at 30 days. RESULTS: A total of 719 individuals were included: 554 (77%) received Molnupiravir, whereas 165 (23%) were NMV-r users. Overall, 43 all-cause hospitalizations (5.9%) and 13 (1.8%) deaths were observed at 30 days. A composite outcome occurred in 47 (6.5%) individuals. At multivariate analysis, male sex [OR 3.785; p = 0.0021], age ≥ 75 [OR 2.647; p = 0.0124], moderate illness [OR 16.75; p < 0.001], and treatment discontinuation after medical decision [OR 8.148; p = 0.0123] remained independently associated with the composite outcome. CONCLUSIONS: No differences between the two antivirals were observed. In this real-life setting, the early use of both of the oral antivirals helped limit composite outcome at 30 days among subjects who were at high risk of disease progression.

Prevalence and Safety of COVID-19 Vaccination in Community-Dwelling People with Dementia: Findings from a Tertiary Memory Clinic in Italy.

This study aimed to explore the prevalence and safety of SARS-CoV-2 vaccination in individuals with dementia. Patients with mild cognitive impairment or dementia were recruited at a tertiary memory clinic, from March 15 to September 15, 2021. Information on COVID-19 vaccination and adverse events experienced after vaccine administration were collected from caregivers. Two-hundred-seventy subjects were finally recruited. Among them, 253 (93.7%) had received the vaccine and only 69 (27.3%) experienced adverse events. Cognitive and behavioral changes following immunization were only rarely reported. COVID-19 vaccination is safe and well-tolerated in patients with cognitive impairment who should be prioritized in the vaccination campaign.

What we know and still ignore on COVID-19 immune pathogenesis and a proposal based on the experience of allergic disorders.

The coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) pandemic started in March 2020 and caused over 5 million confirmed deaths worldwide as far August 2021. We have been recently overwhelmed by a wide literature on how the immune system recognizes severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2) and contributes to COVID-19 pathogenesis. Although originally considered a respiratory viral disease, COVID-19 is now recognized as a far more complex, multi-organ-, immuno-mediated-, and mostly heterogeneous disorder. Though efficient innate and adaptive immunity may control infection, when the patient fails to mount an adequate immune response at the start, or in advanced disease, a high innate-induced inflammation can lead to different clinical outcomes through heterogeneous compensatory mechanisms. The variability of viral load and persistence, the genetic alterations of virus-driven receptors/signaling pathways and the plasticity of innate and adaptive responses may all account for the extreme heterogeneity of pathogenesis and clinical patterns. As recently applied to some inflammatory disorders as asthma, rhinosinusitis with polyposis, and atopic dermatitis, herein we suggest defining different endo-types and the related phenotypes along COVID-19. Patients should be stratified for evolving symptoms and tightly monitored for surrogate biomarkers of innate and adaptive immunity. This would allow to preventively identify each endo-type (and its related phenotype) and to treat patients precisely with agents targeting pathogenic mechanisms.

Supporting and Protecting People with Dementia in the COVID-19 Pandemic.

We aimed to explore the awareness and preparedness of dementia caregivers and people with mild cognitive deficits on how to prevent COVID-19 infection and cope with the indirect consequences of the pandemic. A total of 139 patient-caregiver dyads received a telephone survey and 109 completed the survey. The majority of respondents reported having a moderate-to-good knowledge of the typical manifestations of COVID-19. Conversely, only few of them were informed of the atypical presentations and on how to recognize emergency warning signs. Filling the knowledge gaps on COVID-19 in the most vulnerable people may represent a significant resource to tackle the pandemic.

The Pipeline of Therapeutics Testing During the Emergency Phase of the COVID-19 Outbreak.

The coronavirus disease 19 (COVID-19) pandemic poses a serious threat to the sustainability of healthcare systems and is currently having a significant effect on living conditions worldwide. No therapeutic agent has yet proven to be effective for the treatment of COVID-19. The management of this disease currently relies on supportive care and the off-label and compassionate use of antivirals and immunomodulators. Nevertheless, there has been a great worldwide effort to progress research and test the efficacy and safety/tolerability profiles of numerous candidate agents that may positively affect the various clinical syndromes associated with COVID-19. In parallel, vaccination and chemoprophylaxis strategies are being investigated. This article provides a summary of interventional studies targeting COVID-19 during the emergency phase of the outbreak to broadly inform clinicians and researchers on what happened and what they can expect in upcoming months. The clinicaltrials.gov database and the European Union (EU) Clinical Trials Register were investigated on March 31, 2020, to identify all ongoing phase 1-4 research protocols testing pharmacological interventions targeting SARS-CoV-2 infection and/or clinical syndromes associated with COVID-19. Overall, six phase 1, four phase 1-2, 14 phase 2, ten phase 2-3, 19 phase 3, and nine phase 4 studies were identified, and the features of these studies are described in the present review. We also provide an updated overview of the change overtime in the pipeline following this emergency phase and based on the current epidemiology of the COVID-19 pandemic.